FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS

Steve Sebelius is editor of CityLife, and a longtime resident of Las Vegas. He’s worked as a reporter for the Las Vegas Sun, a writer for CityLife, and as a political columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. He was born and raised in Southern California, and returns regularly for fun in the sun where it’s not 116 degrees and where the “water feature” is named the “Pacific Ocean.” In addition to politics, he enjoys movies, fine wine, fine cigars, fine restaurants, television and books of all kinds. He blogs most every weekday.

View all blog entries
September 2007
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Monthly archives
Ensign mystery deepens … or not

Well, it’s now official, people. U.S. Sen. John Ensign was not the senator who put an anonymous hold on a bill that would require immediate, electronic disclosure of campaign finances. Or at least that’s what Ensign now says.

After Ensign tried to introduce a totally unrelated amendment — forcing outside groups that file ethics complaints against senators to disclose their donors — people assumed that Ensign was the one who was blocking the original bill behind the scenes. The Hill newspaper even ran a story saying Ensign had admitted to it.

Ensign’s comment: "I don’t remember. I honestly don’t remember."

Well, according to the Las Vegas Sun, Ensign’s staff checked it out, and learned that he hadn’t placed the anonymous hold on the bill. Or at least that’s what Ensign now says.

First good batch of questions of the day: Why the hell didn’t Ensign know for sure that he did, or didn’t, do it when reporters first asked him? Why did his staff have to check? Is Ensign holding a lot of bills behind the scenes? What the hell is happening with this guy anyway?

But that’s not the most interesting thing about the Sun story: It turns out, the outside-groups amendment (widely believed to be a poison pill to kill disclosure, which Republicans seem to dislike) was originally proposed by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Ensign just agreed to be its sponsor, or as they say in Washington, to carry McConnell’s water.

"I felt it was a good idea for me to do it," Ensign said of the sponsoring/water carrying.

Hey, it works for him: After Ensign agreed to the unenviable task of helping Republicans raise money and get candidates elected to office in 2008, he was rewarded with a prestigious seat on the Senate Finance Committee. After trying to kill electronic filing — a bill Ensign claims to support — who knows what he might get from McConnell.

But at least one thing about this mystery is clear: If anybody ever asks what the taste of success on the Republican side of the U.S. Senate is, you can tell them what Ensign would, if he was being honest about things: It tastes just like Mitch McConnell’s ass!

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
One Response to “Ensign mystery deepens … or not”

If success tastes like Mitch McConnell’s ass, what tastes like Larry Craig’s…oh, never mind…?

Written by: Goldy on Monday, Oct. 1, 2007 at 2:12 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics